in a bolt-action rifle, it is indeed a lighting rod in an AR-15.. I can calculate and compensate for a little more drop a lot easier than I can compensate for rapidly varying wind speeds when shooting 800 yards across a valley. The short answer is no. Well, at least it's a headshot. 224 Valkyrie Range TestingModern shooters are like most people: Theyre more interested in what something can do for them than its history. it's Arkysaw. Because 22 Nosler is a unique case with a rebated rim, your only source of brass to date is Nosler (at around 70 cents per case) or by buying and shooting 22 Nosler ammunition. If you're short on time or have no stomach for massive walls of text, here's the summary: 224 Valkyrie is cheaper to shoot, the cartridge case makes more sense from a reloading perspective, and it offers better performance at long distance, especially when considering wind, thanks to its ability to shoot heavier bullets. When I shot Team safari we paid attention to the 223 vs the 224, it was easily 5 to 1, For me ONLY (others do whatever works for you) -. WebHere we take the .224 Valkyrie head to head with the 6.8 SPC. 12pm-6pm CST Mon He also told me that no one has been having stability problems with the new bullet. (r.) For varmints and such, Federal is offering a 60-grain Nosler Ballistic Tip load with a muzzle velocity of about 3,200 fps for the 224 Valkyrie. I fully expect that, when other ammunition manufacturers choose to load 224 Valkyrie, we will see a 100-150fps bump but even if we don't, 224 Valkyrie is superior to both 223 Rem and 22 Nosler for long range shooting, if for no other reason than the case design allows for longer bullets that help buck wind better. Well, it might shock you to learn that a bullet with a G1 ballistic coefficient of .399 and a muzzle velocity of 2850fps has a really, really similar trajectory to a bullet with a G1 ballistic coefficient of .393 and a muzzle velocity of 2800fps. Photo Credit: Kestrel Meters. I prefer to use the G7 drag profile when calculating trajectory and wind drift for HPBT bullets because that's exactly what G7 was meant to do, while G1 is more of a flat base shape. This gives everyone options, and the starting price for some 75gr FMJ 224 Valkyrie is about 50 cents a round. Power: .224 Valkyrie rounds are available with ballistic tips, transferring more energy on impact for increased lethality when you're hunting game. With both 90-grain loads, actual velocities were slightly higher than the published 2,550 fps for the Fusion load, and 2,700 fps for the Match load. agree with southpaw. I've already shot it, and I want to share the gospel of the Valkyrie with you. Head to Head: .22 Nosler vs. .224 Valkyrie - An Official Journal Of Most people seem to buy ARs for home defense or plinking, both of which the AR in 5.56 excels in doing. Paste as plain text instead, Stock: Injection-molded synthetic, Sitka Optifade Subalpine finish Sights: None; Picatinny rail 224 Valkyrie he fired one round and it didnt even phase him, he shot another and that one done the trick. You see, the 75gr Full Metal Jacket load the "cheap stuff" from Federal for the 224 Valkyrie is the former, and 7.62x51 M80 ball out of a 24.8" barrel the latter. The strength of the 224 Valkyrie is clear: a heavier bullet with a higher BC, even at a slightly lower velocity, means longer supersonic range and less wind drift. Despite having a heavier profile barrel (and less material removed from the inside of the barrel), the 224 Valkyrie rifle came in over a pound lighter than the 308 Win rifle when unloaded. 224 Valkyrie vs 6.5 Creedmoor: Which Cartridge is Better? No, it's not entirely fair to compare 18" with 20" barrels, but it's not likely that you would see more than a 50fps bump by going to a 20" 22 Nosler barrel. Its not as fast as the 22 Nosler, mostly because the 22 Nosler has a higher case capacity. he stunk too bad for me to mess with. Though still shy of the Creedmoor ballistically, from an AR-15 its as close as youre going to getat least until something new and even more specialized comes along. Thats like saying one of your AIs are a standard factory gun. Theres a lot more room for debate with this question compared with the 5.56 NATO vs .224 Valkyrie conundrum. Not quite. You keep running into big fuckers like that, and you just need to hunt with the M-2HB. could probably make it happen with 153's at around 2400fps. Display as a link instead, But the Valkyrie still holds the trump card: heavy bullets. The 224 Valkyrie was engineered to do a specific thing better than any commercially available AR-15 cartridge, and that thing is not general in nature. ComparisonYou are probably wondering where the 224 Valkyrie is positioned when all the commercially available cartridges compatible with the AR-15 platform are considered. it tore a gaping hole on exit. Of course, this is true with many cartridges, and is likely to be true with 224 Valkyrie. Take for example a 300BLK in a bolt, to me that would only make sense if you were going to shoot it subsonic / suppressed all the time. Pics do not do this thing justice, he was huge. (See page 74.) (l.) The hallmark load for the 224 Valkyrie is the 90-grain Sierra MatchKing, which at 2,700 fps has set the new standard for long-range performance from an AR-15. Because 224 Valkyrie has a different pressure curve than 223 Remington, the gas system must be a different length. However, since the Valkyrie can handle heavier bullets with a higher BC, at extended distancelike at 1,000 yardsthe Valkyrie is the better performer. A 22-24" 6.5 creed gas gun gun should have no problem pushing those bullets to 2600. By shortening the case and changing the shoulder, like Hornady did when transforming the .308 Win./30 TC to the 6.5 Creedmoor, it created a cartridge compatible with very high BC bullets, that will outperform its parents. More important was if the actual velocities equaled those advertised by Federalfor the 224 Valkyrie cartridge. How boring! A lot of shooters have figured this out, and this is I think the biggest reason why 224 Valkyrie is here to stay. I bought the 224V Kool-Aid wish I hadn'tnever could get it to taste right..LOL. I've not shot the 88gr ELD load yet but don't see any need to, if I want to shoot to 1200 yards I'm gonna grab a rifle I am more capable with. The 224 Valks long, slender, and heavy bullet conveys a very flat trajectory. I guess you get what you pay for; it has a suggested retail of $3,789.95. At 500 yards, its still cooking at 1,994 fps and carries 1,422 fps at 1,000 yards. 2650-2700 is doable with the 140's with mild pressure. I am not trying to talk anyone out of it glad the kinks have been worked out and its working great for some for me personally I will never do a bolt rifle with it, but I may readdress it in a AR. As for the .224 Valkyrie, in some states you cant legally hunt big game with a .22-caliber; 6mm (.244) is the minimum. If your needs are generalized, this makes sense. Rifleshooter.com measured the .224 Valkyries velocities at each barrel length with four different types of factory ammo. On the other hand, the JP rifle was a tack driver. 224 Valkyrie vs Same Day Shipping when order is placed before 1PM EST. AR-10 / LR-308 Complete Upper Receiver Assemblies, AR-10/LR-308 Buffers, Buffer Tubes, and Kits, Shop All AR-15 Complete Upper Receiver Assemblies, Shop All AR-10 / LR-308 Complete Upper Receiver Assemblies, Shop All AR-10 / LR-308 Upper Receiver Parts, Shop All AR-10 / LR-308 Lower Receiver Parts, Shop All Handgun Barrels & Muzzle Devices, Shop All Bipods / Monopods & Accessories. With the valkyrie and cartridges like @padoms along with all the 6mm s available it's getting tight in performance. NO.
Does Phil Simms Really Throw Knives, Articles OTHER