I got all my standard 80mm fronts from him, as well as slip-on lens caps. The Carl Zeiss Distagon 2.8/28 T* enjoys a very good reputation and it is a bit more expensive at around 250. Never been an issue for us - and truth be told, if I have a problem with a lens, Id send it to Duclos anywaybut be advised. I'll definitely look into my adapter. That information was usually written in the lens case, and the focal length was on a sticker attached to the lens cap. I started with the 28mm. i want contax set for ef mount how can i buy? Contax Zeiss Survival Guide: Adapted Lens Talk Forum: Digital The last decision I had to make was between the 18mm f/4 and the 15mm f/3.5. Theyre fully manual focus and aperture -, have solid metal construction, long focus throw, and a great feel overall. Not too sure but it seems likely. However, the optical quality of the Contaxs is certainly very close to ZF/ZEs and many of the designs appear to have only subtly changed over the years, in particular the 21 2.8, 34 1.4, 50 1.4, and 85 1.4. The Contax 25mm 2.8 is good, but you may want to consider the 28mm 2.8 which is cheaper, and "technically" better. Vintage Lenses Recommendation (Contax Yashica, Canon FD, Minolta MD Its a gradual process, guys. I'm liking my 28:2.8 AE. I got all my standard 80mm fronts from him, as well as slip-on lens caps. Contax/Yashica Lenses - Which are the best? - FM Forums Are usually 3.5 and F4. Enjoy! Informative and equally hilarious in parts :) I'm sure it will prove a resource for many many people over the years. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. I repeated the technique for the rear caps, this time with only the focal length written on them. Speaking of good prices, many links in this post will take you directly to eBay searches of each specific lens! X. X. It all started when I stumbled upon a post on Craigslist from a guy selling his Contax Zeiss set. It looked neat, but from my experiences as 2nd Assistant Camera, I was constantly being asked how fast so-and-so lens was, or whats its minimum focus. The more opinions you have, the less you see. Im gonna stop saying these lenses are sharp, because at this point its just standard! I have no idea why this is so and why they continue to sell this dog which takes until at least 2.8 to get reasonably sharp. Each page with eight stickers cost me about $10. Otherwise, the transition from AE was meant to be seamless. I know I stopped mentioning how sharp these lenses are, but the 60mm is worth highlighting. I dont want to get into a German war over which is better, Leica R or Contax. You can either build a $1500 set or a $10000 set and youll always impress with the results. Canon FD's are the predecessors to Canon L glass, and have a superb pedigree. On digital, these things are a home run, like Standards and Super Speeds. Theyre much cheaper than modern lenses, yet share similar designs and performance. Thoughts? Page of 321. Old against New: Zeiss 2.8/28 vs Sony FE 2/28 vs Minolta MC 2/28 These babies were bleeding me dry. You have to admit they look sexy. The 18mm is almost one fourth of the price and half the weight of the 15mm, plus it fits along with the other MMJs in the set. The optics in these Zeiss are very similar, if not the same as the current Zeiss still lenses, a different coating on the glass is the main difference. Also, Super Speeds are a 1.2/1.4 at 18mm and 25mm. Collapse. I find it charming, its a lot like the Cooke 8-blade star you see in the back of every True Blood Merlots shot, so I dig it. They are made in Spain, cost about 60 euros each and you install them on the back of the lenses using the provided screws. Copyright 2007-2022. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. This page was generated at 05:50 PM. Heres a very interesting article that summarizes tech papers published on these designs and their differences, pros and cons. After I read stellar reviews about the 28mm f/2.0 Hollywood, I went looking for one. Filter. The screws on the back of the lenses are tiny, and if you strip them, you cant get the new mount into place. length (call Peter at RP lens, he can help), but if you can get them on your RED, they are also fantastic budget options. Contax Zeiss Survival Guide - REDUSER.net Evin Grant's comprehensive lens database Login or Sign Up Logging in. But dont expect them to have the even performance of a set of Ultraprimes or Masterprimes (where many of the primes are not only similar in size and weight, but also perform similarly at matching T stops!). Collapse. Because they focus the right way (ZFs do not, they are Nikon-oriented and focus backwards) and have an aperture ring (ZEs dont have one, as they are EOS-designed and have a digital iris controlled by the camera). The Hollywood is indeed a star and the image that comes out of it is much more appealing than the 28/2.8. Happy with 35-70(macro too) 3.4 & 85 1.4 on a6300(with speed booster). Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom impress in a lot of ways, but their noise reduction lags the competition and their lens corrections lack a real-world basis. And. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. When designing your focus gears, keep the number of teeth constant for all the lenses. The price was pretty good and Im the type of person that can buy something just because the price is good. I always took the 135 with me and some of my favorite photos come from that time. As stated repeatedly, like ZF/ZEs, Contax lenses have great cinema mechanics. Its not. Like ZF/ZEs, they have fantastic barrel rotations (often 180 degrees or more). Contax Zeiss Survival Guide - REDUSER.net Im sure that approach had similar benefits with cinema lenses and Hasselblads. Quite remarkable sharpness at F2.8 for such a small and cheap lens. Momentum picked up and I saw myself getting ready to DP a webseries pilot. The AE's are no longer serviced by Zeiss, keep that in mind. Originally launched in 1932 as a rangefinder system to compete with - you guessed it. Germany vs Japan? That's what I'm thinking, though no official sources have been cited on the tests, it may have been pulled from articles or done independently, not sure. They have a pleasing organic rendering that is not dissimilar to Contax. Posts; Latest Activity; Photos . Finally found the old MTF charts for each of the Zeiss Contax lenses. WOW! Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* (C/Y) 35-70mm f3.4: A review Mar 18, 2014 at 04:52 PM Anyone who says a lens made in Germany is better than the same lens made in Japan is full of shit. The 21/2.8 was a must. I know a bunch of photo magazines back in the 90's and early 2000's did comprehensive tests and reviews of Contax, I wonder if they lifted the numbers from one of those? Contax Zeiss 60mm f/2.8 Macro AEG: Infinity focus on the left, minimum focus on the right. I shipped all of them to SIMMOD for declicking and a quick checkup. 06-22-2022, 04:47 PM Hey, everybody, I know we have the awesome Contax Zeiss Survival Guide but looking at building a set of Zeiss lenses myself from bargain finds and fixer uppers I've collected, I wondered what anybody's experiences might have been with mixing Zeiss lineups together? In my experience, ALL AEs have the Ninja-Star. Only correction I did to this photograph was to increase RAW color temperature, that's it. X. X. Landmine Media, LLC. It also has built-in color filters which I freaked out when I realized how to turn them. Or get a Duclos/Tokina 11-16. I met amazing businesses with folks that really know how to deal with their customers, I did try out mindblowing glass and I was humbled by all the feedback I got when asking questions about what would be my best options in the middle of the process and posting updates of what I was working on. Its been there for quite a while and I have checked up on it countless times to help me make decisions. The planar 35mm F/1.4, 50mm T1.4 and 85mm F/1.4, are among some of them. I'm sure its just due to copy variation and the years its weathered but pretty disappointing. @Yean: I'm 99 % sure it's the adapter then. These last two are challenging to adapt to EOS because of their. Would love to check out the Hollywood, but $$. Wake the fuck up. You can use the code CINE at check out for a nifty discount! I would jump on it in a heart-beat. Also almost twice as big and heavy as the previous one. Its also quite similar to the modern 15/2.8 ZF/ZE offered by Zeiss, just a 2/3 stops slower. They are made in Spain, cost about 60 euros each and you install them on the back of the lenses using the provided screws. Stay current with regular CineD updates about news, reviews, how-tos and more. For a while I didnt understand the need for 80mm fronts, so Ill share what I learned so others wont live too long unknowing like me!
Rose Quartz Orgone Pyramid Benefits, Articles C