The cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), is a highly invasive and harmful pest. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the The natural hosts are: cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii (Glov.) How clear and transparent is the journal's website? Author wants to withdraw or insist on re-reviewing at proof stage of publication. Is it safe to publish research papers in cooperation with Russian academics? FEMS Microbiology Letters364, no. Your email address will not be published. Predatory journals take advantage of thedivergent publishing policies of open access journals to scam authors. We aim to rapidly publish short-form articles such as brief reports, case studies, "orphaned" findings, and ideas dropped from previously-published work. 4 (June 2020): 607-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623320920209. Rapid spread of this pest worldwide has accelerated research on its biology, ecology and management. View Author & Reviewer Guidelines Published with Academia Letters Predatory and mediocre journals are based on the model of open access publishing in which authors pay fees to have their work published online. 21 (November 2017). Because there are so many academic journals in publication, and new journals are not uncommon, many modern academics have unwittingly submitted manuscripts for publication to a predatory journal. 4 (2019): 661664. What can be done when a professor from reputable institute asks me to publish in a predatory journal? In other words, the decline in publishing standards is based on poor copyediting. Interpreting non-statistically significant results: Do we have "no evidence" or "insufficient evidence" to reject the null? It's also important to keep in mind what a journal's editorial criteria are, and whether both the reviewers and authors have respected those boundaries. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep. Cureus. But the adults in starved condition consumed equal number of live and frozen aphids. National Library of Medicine 0000-0002-7299-680X), PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, and is based in San Francisco, California, US, PLOS will use your email address to provide news and updates. It was during a smaller conference I attended where everybody was talking, With Christmas just around the corner, I would like to take the opportunity to recommend some climate books to read over the. Inclusion on Beall's list would count as a professional opinion that the journal was predatory at the time it was added. But still, predatory is a not very well defined phrase, e.g. While many legitimateopen access journals exist, the lack of involvementwith a traditional publisher greatly improves the ability of predatory publishers to operate within an open access environment. But is this a problem if researchers do this willingly and knowingly as seems to be the case according to the survey? In medical journals, everything has to be accurate -- every comma, every word -- so that was my first suspicion.. Conduct a news search for the journal to see if any allegations have been made against it. On what basis are pardoning decisions made by presidents or governors when exercising their pardoning power? We recommend that scholars read the available reviews, assessments and descriptions provided here, and then decide for themselves whether they want to submit articles, serve as editors or on editorial boards. But despite being an academic headache for many years, the knowledge of predatory strategies and techniques is still sparse within the research community. The scholarly community can very well stand one more fake journal like Academia Letters so why the rant and rush to delete my account? However, OMICS continues its predatory practices in general since buying these journals, and the expansion from three to ten journals is very suspicious. @ASimpleAlgorithm no, but the question of whether only author-pays journals can be predatory is a controversial one too. Declaration of Conflicting Interests Statement. To obtain https://doi:10.12688/f1000research.15256.2. 8600 Rockville Pike The highest search rates () of larvae reared on artificial diet and C. cephalonica eggs were of 0.688 and 0.404 on mealybug and whitefly, respectively. 2021 Sep 24;17(4):90-92. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.650. ", that would count. There are a lot of questions here on what predatory journals are, and how to tell if a journal is one or not. Why do open access consortia affiliate themselves with questionable publishers. Cabells uses 65 criteria to spot wilier frauds. Studies were conducted to check the suitability of live and frozen rose and mustard aphids to rear seven spotted ladybird beetle under two feeding conditions i.e., fed normally (unstarved beetles) or hungry (starved) for 16 hours. The present study was done to observe predatory behaviour of chrysoperla carnea and how it can successfully be implied in initializing an effective biological control programme. Some common forms of predatory publishing practices include falsely claiming to provide peer review, hiding informatio rev2023.4.21.43403. (eggs), Pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. However if you read the quoted source, the objection is: Rose Simpson, the former managing editor of the Canadian Journal of General Internal Medicine, said that after the OMICS deal was announced in January, she went on the companys website and immediately noticed red flags as she started browsing through the journals. This guide contains information about best practices in academic publishing and information about predatory journals and other pitfalls. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds toupgrade your browser. It is apparent that the monetisation and commercialisation of research output has lead to a situation where being cited has become a goal in itself. Indian PhDs, professors are paying to publish in real-sounding, fake The feeding potential of Chrysoperla carnea larvae and adults of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri on different nymphal instars of cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis was investigated in ambient laboratory conditions at Agricultural Research Institute, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. A journal developed a strong reputation for being predatory, recognized this, and engaged in a good-faith process of reform, eventually gaining at least a non-trivial amount of scientific credibility or impact? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England98, no. The tipping point for me was the kind of vision for academia that the company, Academia Inc., represents with its Academia Letters and other initiatives; for instance, the company previously toyed with the idea of allowing individuals to promote their papers for a fee. This question isn't really answerable because what's predatory and what isn't predatory isn't well-defined. sure, the difference is a spectrum not a hard boundary, and is in many instances debatable. Simply gaining prestige over time through hard work or losing it gradually due to laziness is just life. Academia Letters is a new, experimental online journal that publishes short form work (800-1,600 words). Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Is the email timestamped at a reasonable hour basedon the expected location of the journal's staff. Summary Postdoctoral Research Associate-Cell Biology of Neural Development St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital St. Jude Childrens Research St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (St. Jude). (PDF) Predatory Potential ofChrysoperla - Academia.edu To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Postdocal Fellows to the Department of Biochemistry, Postdoctoral Research Associate - Developmental Neurobiology, Postdoctoral Research Associate - Hematology. Academic Knowledge and Research Publishing, Academic Organization for Advancement of Strategic and International Studies, Academic Research in Science, Engineering, Art and Management, Academic World Education & Research Center, Academy for Environment and Life Sciences, Academy of Business & Scientific Research, Academy of IRMBR International Research in Management and Business Realities, Academy of Scientific and Applied Research, Advance Educational Institute & Research Centre, Advanced Institute of Convergence Information Technology, Advanced Science and Engineering Technology Institute, Advancement and Development in Technology International, Albert Science International Organization, American Academic & Scholarly Research Center, American Association for Science and Technology, American Research Institute for Policy Development, American Society of Science and Engineering, Asia-Pacific Association of Medical Research, Asia Pacific Institute of Advanced Research, Asian and American Research Publishing Group, Association for Sustainable Education, Research and Science, Association of Computer Electronics and Electrical Engineers, Association of North America Higher Education International, Athens Institute for Education and Research, Australasian Centre for Research and Development, Australian Academy of Business and Social Sciences, Australian Academy of Business Leadership. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. Hindawi's journals were on the Beall's List too, if I remember correctly. However, unlike legitimate journals, they bombard academics with spam emails, accept almost all submissions and overstate the rigour of their peer-review processes. At the same time they can promise a review report within a week and quick publication dates, which of course is troublesome if the peer review process is not handled correctly. So is this an instance of a predatory publisher raising its content standards and going legitimate, or respected journals getting taken over and becoming predatory, or are they meeting somewhere in the middle (shoddy scientific practices but not outright misconduct)? A predatory journal, by contrast, will place all ofthe costs on the author or the author's institution in the form of a directpayment for publication. Predatory journals-also called fraudulent, deceptive, or pseudo-journals-are publications that claim to be legitimate scholarly journals but misrepresent their publishing practices.